As far as I can tell from listening to education experts the answer we, as educators, are supposed to give to this question is “no.” The term is too fuzzy, cannot be defined, etc. As far as I can tell from listening to teachers in the classroom, by and large we believe that the answer is “yes.” We try to foster understanding as much as possible in the classroom.
I first ran across the dilemma about understanding by attending workshops designed to focus on learning outcomes. Much to my surprise it was taken as a given that “understanding” could not be a learning outcome never mind what teachers might say. But, I think there’s a problem lurking in the outcomes approach that leads to the conclusion that understanding cannot be a learning outcome. The problem is succinctly expressed in a recent New Atlantic article titled “Is Google Making us Stupid?” The presumption of learning outcomes is “a belief that intelligence is the output of a mechanical process, a series of discrete steps that can be isolated, measured, and optimized... There’s little place for the fuzziness of contemplation. Ambiguity is not an opening for insight but a bug to be fixed.”
I worried for some time that I was alone in the belief that education could focus on understanding. After all, education experts are united in their view of assessment and outcomes. Well, maybe not. Consider Howard Gardner; a well respected psychologist and researcher in education. In his book
The Disciplined Mind, he actually advocates a curriculum based on the goal of achieving understanding!
He begins by defining understanding. “An individual understands a concept, skill, theory, or domain of knowledge to the extent that he or she can apply it appropriately in a new situation.” I submit that this is what we should all expect from our students. Rather than feeding them the material that’s going to be on the exam and, what’s worse, feeding them the exact format of the exam, we need to be teaching them to apply what they learn in situations they have not yet seen. After all, isn’t this exactly what they will have to do to succeed in the 21st century world of work? What good does it do to train students to answer specific questions about specific concepts in a completely predictable environment when they will rarely see such environments but will need to figure out how to apply what they’ve learned nonetheless?
In their book
Sparks of Genius, Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein illustrate the problems that come from ignoring understanding in education. “The problem with divorcing what and how in education is that knowing about things is not the same as understanding them. Richard Feynman made the point when he said, apropos of the French curve, ‘I don’t know what’s the matter with people: they don’t learn by understanding: they learn some other way- by rote or something. Their knowledge is so fragile.’ “ Feynman is correct and, frankly, the advocates of learning outcomes that ignore understanding are going to be responsible for creating more graduates with excellent grades and fragile knowledge. Is that an accomplishment they will look back on with pride?
When it comes to the emphasis on understanding another way of saying the same thing is that we want to teach students how to think in addition to providing them with useful content. But, do “approved” learning outcomes foster this goal? Let’s look at some of the examples of good learning outcomes: describe, identify, sort, compare, and contrast. While these are useful skills they do not go as far as understanding in the sense that Gardner advocates. When presented with several options (which the students most likely knew they would see on the exam) they can compare them, contrast them, identify them, etc. But, when presented with the complicated world of information and competing claims for their attention are they able to figure out which items need comparing? Can they figure out whether a given description of something (a political speech, a crime scene, a project at work) is accurate or complete? Having identified the main point of a speech, essay, or blog online can they critically evaluate it? Can they understand it? I would hope that these are important questions and I would hope that we as educators would want to help our students master these skills.
